MAXQDA vs. NVivo vs. Delve: Comparing Top QDA Software
Thinking about using qualitative data analysis (QDA) software but not sure where to start? You're not alone. Faced with mountains of interviews, transcripts, or open-ended responses, it's natural to wonder: Should I use a QDA tool to tackle this project? And if yes, which one?
QDA software like MAXQDA, NVivo, and Delve are three widely-used solutions. This article compares the strengths, weaknesses, and user reviews of each of these tools.
How to Choose Qualitative Data Analysis Software
You want the best QDA tool available without breaking the bank. It should be intuitive and not take days or weeks to learn. Here are a few more ways to differentiate one option from another:
Strengths and weaknesses: From coding powers to collaboration features and data visualization, you want to know what features you need and which tool fits that mold.
Price and learning curve: Do you need a sophisticated QDA tool? What’s the right price range for you? Does ease of use trump advanced features? It helps to answer all of these.
Who's it for? Usually, student researchers need different tools than seasoned pros.
These variables help you get a better idea of what to look for in your ideal coding software. Now, let’s get into some specifics.
Comparing NVivo vs. MAXQDA vs. Delve
While Dedoose, NVivo, and Delve share core features, they differ in functionality, user-friendliness, cost, system requirements, and collaboration tools. Here’s an overview of each.
NVivo: Tackling Large Datasets
NVivo excels in handling complex datasets, making it a top choice for experienced researchers with previous experience using QDA software. It is the most robust but also the most expensive tool on this list. Researchers like that it supports various file formats, such as text, audio, and video.
However, for those new to qualitative research or seeking simplicity, NVivo might pose a learning challenge. Users also give the tool low marks for collaboration functionality, and the additional add-on costs for these features are prohibitive, especially for students.
NVivo requires device-specific, annual licensing that can be frustrating for researchers. Users also report bugs in the software that risk potential data loss and research setbacks.
Ideal for:
Researchers with ample funds who are managing large datasets, especially if working independently.
Key Features:
Powerful features
Not collaboration-friendly
Cost-prohibitive
How it operates:
Desktop application (on your computer)
Optional online collaboration (use with care)
Cost:
$1195+/year
Add-on cost for collaborative features
MAXQDA: Versatile Yet Complex
While MAXQDA shines in its versatility and mixed-method capabilities, user reviews highlight areas for improvement. Though it offers robust coding, analysis, and visualization tools for different research needs, its limited customer service and training resources can slow down the research process. The pricing also might not fit every budget.
Key features:
Suitable for diverse research methods
Steep learning curve
Lack of training resources
Desktop subscription required
Ideal for:
MAXQDA's versatility for mixed-method research makes it a powerful tool for this type of qualitative research.
How it operates:
Desktop application (on your computer)
Requires updates
Upgrades for collaboration features
Desktop subscription required
Cost:
$232 per year (for individual use, no collaboration)
$432 per year (if collaboration is desired)
Delve: User-Friendly and Affordable
Delve stands out as the user-friendly option in the group, suitable for beginners or anyone seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly coding solution with collaboration capabilities. It was created by former researchers who were frustrated by the lack of simple QDA tools available in the market.
Here’s what one user has to say about Delve:
“The feature set is very intuitive to learn and start using right away. The interface makes it very easy to construct codes, highlight and code text and view excerpts in different ways. Being able to code as little as a word or as much as a paragraph (or multiple paragraphs) results in more robust coding. Knowing that I can focus solely on coding and let the platform categorize the data for me means coding takes much less time than doing it by hand.
Once I have coded everything, I can then view the data in different ways, start my analysis and find the story.” Read more.
Noteworthy aspects of Delve:
User-friendly and intuitive interface
Web-based connectivity with no device restrictions
Side-by-side coding comparisons for enhanced analysis
Automated intercoder reliability scores for accuracy
Delve offers data visualization tools, including co-occurrence matrices, but is limited in complex diagramming or advanced visualizations. Most novice researchers don't require these features, and the Delve team continually updates the platform based on user feedback.
This is the only web-based QDA tool on this list, making it easy to access from anywhere.
Ideal for:
A wide range of users, including students, academics, market researchers, analysts, and social science professionals. Perfect for those new to qualitative data analysis or seeking an efficient, budget-friendly option focused on collaborative qualitative analysis.
How it operates:
100% web-based
Accessible from any device
Cost:
$432/year (with annual discount)
$50/month (commercial pricing)
$18/month or $200/year (with academic discount)
Table: Comparing MAXQDA vs. NVivo vs. Delve
| Feature | MAXQDA | NVivo | Delve |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal Pricing | $232+/year | $1,195+/year | $432/year (with annual discount) |
| Education Pricing | $104/year (no collaboration, limited features) | $1,019+/year (desktop only) | $200/year |
| Upgrades | $1,391+/year (full features with collaboration) | $1,519+/year (desktop with web-based add-on) | No upgrade required |
| Ease of Use | Complex | Cumbersome | Intuitive |
| Licensing | Desktop, web-based add-on | Desktop, web-based add-on | Web-based |
| Best for | Researchers with experience using other QDA tools | Solo researchers who work with huge amounts of data | Researchers who are new to qualitative data analysis, work in groups, or work remotely. |
User Reviews: MAXQDA vs. NVivo vs. Delve
Here’s how MAXQDA, NVivo, and Delve stack up, according to users.
See the full breakdown on Capterra.
More User Reviews
To make it easier to compare quickly, we organize these comparisons based on what most researchers consider important when they pick a QDA tool.
Pricing
❌ What Customers Say About MAXQDA
“Cost restrictive for students.” Read more.
“It is rather expensive and I would like to find some software that offers a very low-cost student edition. Our students are not going to be doing as much research as some doc students as they are leaders in public schools. Purchasing an expensive product doesn't make sense.” Read more.
“Because MAXQDA is quite costly, it is a barrier that detracts from more widespread use.” Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“NVivo is pricy especially for graduate students and early career researchers, if their institutions or organizations do not provide access to it.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“The education pricing is so inexpensive that Delve would be highly appropriate for students just learning how to code as well as seasoned researchers. It's also flexible enough that you only pay for the time that you're using the program - in my case I used it all the time at first, then paused my membership and reopened it when I had new data and analysis to do.” Read more.
“The price is very reasonable as it has an offer for Academia.” Read more.
“It is an amazing value for the cost.” Read more.
“Excellent price.” Read more.
Collaboration
❌ What Customers Say About MAXQDA
“A downside of using MaxQDA was that it had to be purchased for each individual laptop (as far as I am aware) and so we were limited to coding on just one device.” Read more.
“The teamwork options are not as seamless as they could be. You have to set up coding in a particular way or merges do not work properly. We find there are not as much functionality as we would like when comparing coding results between different coders.” Read more.
“You cannot have multiple users working on the same project and automatically save. merging projects is not a very obvious function.” Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“If you want to work in a team look elsewhere.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“Delve is very easy to learn and use individually or as a team. Using Delve has shortened our time to process text for coding and organizing for presentations. Used with time codes, it can also shorten video editing times. We've used several other products and found Delve to be a perfect complement to our workflow.” Read more.
“We were up and running with Delve within minutes. It was very intuitive to use, with very quick setup. We were able to easily collaborate and facilitate our thematic analysis process without a steep learning curve and at a very reasonable price.” Read more.
“Wonderful user interface and coding process, loved how easy it is to collaborate with others.” Read more.
“Most importantly, Delve makes it easy and intuitive to share my results with my collaborators.” Read more.
Learning Curve
❌ What Customers Say About MAXQDA
“The actual coding process can be unintuitive and has a steep learning curve.” Read more.
“Getting the most out of it does require a rather steep learning curve.” Read more.
“There is a required learning curve for MAX QDA. You will need to commit some time to learning the software to succeed.” Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“It is not very user friendly, there are plenty of options but you need a whole course to learn to work with it.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“Delve has made coding qualitative data so simple and fast. The user-friendliness makes it a must-have for any qualitative researcher.” Read more.
“Delve was very easy to use and it was quick to pick up. All of the functions I used were user-friendly and perfect for my research project.” Read more.
“There is no steep learning curve involved. You simply upload or paste your transcripts and start coding.” Read more.
“I saved a tons of hours learning a complex software and using it. Also price is very competitive for student version." Read more.
“This tool cut HOURS of time sorting through qualitative data! I love the “snippets” feature and how easy it made analyzing themes for my dissertation! You will love this product.” Read more.
User Interface
❌ What Customers Say About MAXQDA
“The user interface of this software leaves a lot to desire.” Read more.
“I found it a bit confusing to use the software to organize the data once all of the data is coded. There are supposedly a ton of functions that allow you to organize the data, yet, even with doing the online, it still felt difficult to me.” Read more.
“While coding, there is an interface on the left that is very restrictive. […] I think the program is confusing, especially during analysis.” Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“The design seemed quite old-fashioned and difficult to navigate.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“The UI is very straightforward and simple to use. Coding text is very easy and tags are automatically compiled into a list for easy access. You can navigate/sort your transcripts by code, meaning it's easy to cross-reference.” Read more.
“I continue to be impressed by the ease of use and the many ways I can integrate the coding and quotes into my dissertation.” Read more.
Tutorials
❌ What Customers Say About MAXQDA
“I also wish tutorials and professional learning development would be more accessible. [...] It sometimes becomes overwhelming and difficult without guidance.” Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“I understand there is always learning curves to be expected when it comes to using a new tool, but I would expect more build-in example, guideline within NVivo for that.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“The easy step-by-step tutorials are a wonderful resource.” Read more.
“The webinars Delve offers on coding were invaluable to my own coding process.” Read more.
“It has very good tutorials that explain in detail how to use the product. Also, the tutorials are short so you don't have to spend lots of time to understand how the tool works. This aspect was very important for me, as I didn't had lots of time to work with the data.” Read more.
Customer Support
❌ What Customers Say About MAXQDA
Staff is unprofessional and unresponsive. Software itself is buggy and feedback is often ignored. terrible experience. Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“I believe that it is totally unacceptable to run a company with NO access to software support.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“The customer support is superb! Support from Delve was so responsive, I was extremely pleased with the level of services I received.” Read more.
“There is an extensive resource library for questions/how to's but also highly responsive customer service if you need help.” Read more.
“One of the things that I like most about this software is that the support team is incredibly responsive and helpful. They answer questions quickly.” Read more.
❌ What Customers Say About NVivo
“The design seemed quite old-fashioned and difficult to navigate.” Read more.
✅ What Customers Say About Delve
“The UI is very straightforward and simple to use. Coding text is very easy and tags are automatically compiled into a list for easy access. You can navigate/sort your transcripts by code, meaning it's easy to cross reference.” Read more.
“I continue to be impressed by the ease of use and the many ways I can integrate the coding and quotes into my dissertation.” Read more.
“Other tools that I have used can be pretty elaborate, but they are clunky and don't follow an intuitive design. Delve was definitely built with the end user in mind.” Read more.
“It is easy to use, doesn't take a long time to pick up on how to use it, there are handy videos also to help you and it is a well thought out and efficient piece of software well worth using as a student or researcher.” Read more.
Deep Dive Into Delve
Researchers give Delve high marks across the board for simplicity, price, and collaborative options. Here are some of the features and benefits that are included with every Delve subscription:
Super Simple Coding
Delve embraces an intuitive design, empowering users to code without extensive training. You won't be bogged down by complex terminology or time-consuming learning curves. Instead, you can seamlessly dive into your projects, saving valuable time for the research itself.
Built For Collaboration
In today's remote research landscape, Delve stands out as a web-based tool that fosters team collaboration from anywhere. Share projects effortlessly with your team, simplifying file sharing and establishing a centralized hub for your research.
Easy Project Sharing
Delve streamlines project sharing, allowing you to share your work with co-researchers and peer reviewers with just a few clicks. You maintain complete control over who joins and leaves your team, ensuring that everyone has the right access to your project files.
Automated Intercoder Reliability Scoring
Delve simplifies your coding process with automated intercoder reliability scoring. This feature saves you time while enhancing the accuracy and consistency of your qualitative analysis, keeping you on the same page with your fellow researchers as you analyze the same data.
Side-by-Side Coding Comparisons
Promote collaborative coding with side-by-side comparisons. Delve lets you code independently and then compare coding approaches without initially seeing each other's work. This feature allows everyone to bring their unique analysis to the data and check for coding divergences.
Responsive Customer Support
Delve's timely customer service ensures you always have the support you need. Reach out via email or live chat whenever questions or challenges arise. Timely assistance and minimal delays keep your research on track, allowing you to finish your work on time and with confidence.
Comprehensive Learning Resources
Qualitative analysis doesn't have to be a mystery. Delve provides a wealth of learning resources to simplify the process. Whether you seek coding tips, Delve YouTube tutorials, or introductions to qualitative research methods, the Delve Learning Center is a one-stop shop for information.
Flexible Account Management
Delve understands the financial realities of students. That's why we offer flexible account management, allowing you to pause or cancel your account as needed. This student-friendly approach aligns with budget constraints, providing peace of mind as you manage your finances.
Seamless Performance Across All Platforms
Delve stands out with its consistent performance across all operating systems. Whether you're using Windows, macOS, or Linux, Delve's web-based platform ensures you can work from your preferred device without limitations or restrictions.
Always Up-to-Date
With Delve's web-based platform, you don’t need any upgrades or updates. Regular, automatic system updates and performance enhancements ensure your research tools are always the best they can be. No waiting necessary, as you'll have immediate access to the latest developments.
IT-Free Experience
No need for complex IT setups or IT assistance. Delve eliminates the need for extensive technical configurations on local servers. Simply launch Delve in your web browser and dive into your research without any IT expertise or knowledge required.
Final Decision: Delve
As alternatives to NVivo and MAXQDA gain traction, Delve stands out as a clear qualitative data analysis tool of choice. Join the growing community of researchers who rely on Delve to streamline their research process.
Start Your Free Trial Today
Experience the Delve difference for yourself – try it free for 14 days!