Inductive Thematic Analysis vs. Deductive Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research

 
 

Thematic analysis is like photography – it’s all about uncovering patterns and telling a story. While deductive analysis is like a planned shoot, knowing what you want to capture, inductive analysis is about observing and connecting key moments as they unfold. Both approaches create meaningful perspectives but in different ways.

With thematic analysis, one of your first critical decisions is choosing between a deductive (theory-guided) or an inductive (data-driven) approach. This decision influences everything from your initial coding strategy to how you ultimately construct meaning from your data.

This article introduces deductive and inductive thematic analysis. We'll provide examples and show how computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) like Delve streamlines the work in either case, helping you organize and code those stacks of interviews in less time.

📝 Need a refresher on inductive versus deductive analysis? Check out our article on inductive vs. deductive coding for more on this topic.

Foundations of Inductive & Deductive Thematic Analysis

Before we get into inductive and deductive thematic analysis, let's take a step back and look at what thematic analysis actually means.

Thematic analysis (TA) is a systematic way of finding meaningful patterns across unwieldy piles of interview transcripts, field notes, or other qualitative data. It's how qualitative researchers analyze huge amounts of information to find important trends or concepts that relate to and answer their research questions.

 
 

Getting to Your Aha Moment

The process of finding themes starts with qualitative coding, where you tag important moments that stick out or hint at something more to explore. After defining and organizing your codes in your codebook, you weave them into overarching themes that tell the deeper story in your data.

Themes are like the main storylines in your data that answer key questions based on what your participants have said. They represent your aha moments that help tell your overarching research story.

  • Themes help you answer, “So what?”

  • If you're studying how teams adapt to remote work, your individual qualitative codes might be "Missed Coffee Chats" or "Awkward Video Calls."

  • A theme unites related codes into a broader story, such as "The Erosion of Informal Workplace Bonds in Virtual Environments." This higher-level insight reveals how virtual work fundamentally changes team relationships. In the process, it helps answer the "so what?" question about your codes.

Though we will explore the different ways to find them, themes become the foundation for insights that move beyond simple descriptions to show what your data really means.

📌 Feeling Lost with Thematic Analysis?

Check out our Practical Guide to Thematic Analysis to get up to speed.

 

Where Do You Stand? Understanding Your Role in Thematic Analysis

 

While understanding themes is essential, Braun and Clarke's influential work highlights something equally important: you, the researcher, actively create these themes through your engagement with the data.

As the pair remind us, your themes won't simply "emerge" from your data (they specifically call out this passive language as a "dangerous myth"). Instead, you need to build them through your own interpretive lens and analytical decisions. But how do you bring you own perspective into the fold without influencing the study? The short answer is you don’t.

Whether you're doing deductive or inductive analysis, your theoretical background, research questions, and even your personal experiences will inevitably shape how you read and make sense of your data. That's not just okay – it's part of the process. Rather than aiming for total objectivity, embrace that your perspective shapes your analysis.

For Braun & Clarke, reflexivity is “a fundamental characteristic of TA.” So whether you start with a top-down deductive theory or create your inductive code from scratch, thematic analysis is about being clear about your thought process through memos and other reflexive tools. The better you’re able to capture and explain your decisions along the way, the more rigorous and reliable your thematic analysis. 

📚 Deep Dive: Reflexivity in Thematic Analysis

Reflexivity shapes how themes are interpreted and constructed. Peer debriefing, reflexive journaling, and memos are invaluable tools for keeping track of your thought process. Learn more about peer debriefing and reflexive memo-writing.

When to Use Deductive vs. Inductive Thematic Analysis 

Your research questions naturally guide your choice between inductive and deductive analysis. Think about what you're really trying to learn when choosing one or the other: Are you testing established theories, or are you exploring new territory? Let's look at how different types of questions point you toward different approaches:

Deductive Thematic Analysis: Starting with Theory

 

Consider a deductive approach to thematic analysis when you plan to:

  • Start With Predefined Codes or Themes: Deductive analysis begins with theoretical concepts or hypotheses, with codes such as "Loss of Social Presence" or "Virtual Communication Dynamics,” based on established frameworks like Organizational Communication Theory (focusing on how people interact, share information, and create relationships within organizations).

  • Focus on Testing or Extending Theories: Use this approach when your goal is to confirm, refine, or challenge existing theories. For example, you might analyze whether virtual environments disrupt traditional communication patterns as predicted by your theoretical model.

  • Align Research Questions With Specific Constructs: Deductive analysis works best when your research questions are tightly focused. In our earlier study example, elements like "social presence" or "mediated communication" ensure you’re focusing on data relevant to Organization Communication Theory.

  • Refine Codes Based on Data: While the initial codes come from the theory, you can adapt them as new insights come to light. While less flexible than inductive coding, you can be flexible without losing alignment with the theoretical framework. Reflexive memos will be an important part of tracking where and how these ideas tie back to the underlying theory.

 
 

This structured approach keeps you grounded (some say tethered) to the existing theory. Starting with theoretical constructs lets you build on insights already validated by other qualitative researchers. It also offers clear starting points for your analysis. However, the trade-off is less flexibility in creating your own codes or developing ideas outside of whatever framework you use.

But what happens when you want to let the data guide you instead? That’s where an inductive approach comes in.

▼

Short Answer: What is Deductive Thematic Analysis?

Deductive thematic analysis means you start with existing theories or frameworks to guide your analysis. You apply and use these theories in a top-down approach to help decide what to look for in your data.

Inductive Thematic Analysis: Building Understanding from Data

Inductive analysis is all about uncovering patterns and insights you might not expect. You’re best off choosing an inductive approach to thematic analysis when you’re approaching your data from the bottom up without any theoretical guardrails:

  • Starting Fresh Without Theoretical Constraints: Like in our remote work example, you might notice unexpected patterns about lost informal moments that existing theories simply don't address. At least not yet!

  • Planning to Let Your Data Lead the Way: Instead of looking for specific communication patterns, you might discover how team dynamics shift in ways theory hasn't predicted.

  • Using Open-Ended Research Questions: When studying how teams adapt to remote work, you might uncover new social patterns that start to form specifically in virtual environments.

  • You're Exploring Something New: If you're studying recent phenomena like remote work transitions, an inductive approach lets you capture new patterns that existing theories might miss.

Where deductive thematic analysis offers the security of established frameworks, inductive thematic analysis rewards your willingness to explore uncharted territory with the possibility of genuine discovery.

▲

Short Answer: What is Inductive Thematic Analysis?

Instead of starting with a theory, you dive into your analysis with fresh eyes to uncover patterns and themes in a bottom-up approach, building your ideas directly from what your data or participants tell you.

Choosing Your Path: Key Questions to Ask Yourself

Whether you prefer working with established frameworks or letting your data lead your analysis is a personal choice that depends on your research style, research questions, and objectives. Neither approach is inherently better or worse for new researchers! Here are a few questions to ask when it comes time for your decision:

  • Research Goals: Are you aiming to explore new phenomena? Consider an inductive approach. Are you testing existing theories? Consider a deductive approach.

  • Data Characteristics: Is your data deep and diverse, or do you already have a specific framework in mind for analysis?

  • Theoretical Familiarity: Are you well-versed in relevant theories, or are you open to letting the data guide your analysis? Consider an inductive approach. 

When in doubt, use these questions. And keep the following table in mind.

Table: Inductive Thematic Analysis vs. Deductive Thematic Analysis

Metric Inductive Thematic Analysis Deductive Thematic Analysis
Approach Bottom-up Top-down
Data Immersion Extensive Moderate
Theoretical Guidance Minimal High
Flexibility High Low
Novel Insights Likely Limited
Research Goals Exploration Theory Testing
Interpretation Structure Emergent Predefined
Time Required Time-intensive Moderate
Suitability Exploratory Research Hypothesis Testing
Top Rated on Capterra

Simplify Your Thematic Analysis with Delve | Top-Rated by Researchers ⇒

Rated as a top qualitative coding software on Capterra, Delve simplifies the entire process, making it easier to uncover patterns, collaborate, and produce insights that matter.

Get 14 Days Free

No commitment. Cancel anytime.

Applying Your Analytical Lens: Creating Inductive and Deductive Themes

Now that we’re up to speed on when to use each approach, let’s look at an example of how to create inductive or deductive themes in an actual qualitative study.

In this example study, you're a qualitative researcher studying how teams adapt to remote work. While you would be working with dozens or hundreds of transcripts in a real study, we’ll use this short snippet from one of the hypothetical interviews to get us started:

📄 Remote Work Study - Interview Excerpt

"The morning standup used to be this quick check-in where we'd grab coffee after. Now it's this formal Zoom thing where everyone's watching their video square. James still tries to crack his terrible jokes, but it's not the same when staring at a screen."

Through a Deductive Lens: Framing the Code Beforehand

Going back to Organizational Communication Theory, you'll look for patterns that connect directly to this theory. For some quick context, organizational communication theory tells us that workplaces rely on a mix of formal and informal channels, with different communication media shaping how people interact and build relationships.

Basic steps for deductive thematic analysis (detailed guide down below):

1. Start with Theory: Begin with organizational communication theory, particularly Media Richness Theory, which looks at how well different media channels convey social cues, nuance, and feedback.

2. Derive Theory-Based Themes: Organizational Communication Theory is the framework for the code. Based on this existing theory, you derive your initial codes:

📄 Remote Work Study - Interview Excerpt with Deductive Codes

"The morning standup used to be this quick check-in1 where we'd grab coffee after2. Now it's this formal Zoom thing3 where everyone's watching their video square. James still tries to crack his terrible jokes, but it's not the same when staring at a screen4."

Codes:

  • 1 Informal communication
  • 2 Social relationship development
  • 3 Media characteristics
  • 4 Channel effectiveness

3. Develop Theoretical Themes: Your theme categorizes and groups these codes. You might explore how virtual environments transform communication by examining these theoretical concepts with a theme like "Effective Leadership Communication." You're analyzing your data through this lens, letting established concepts guide how you identify and connect patterns.

By using Organizational Communication Theory, you’re identifying themes like "Effective Leadership Communication" or "Impact of Organizational Culture on Remote Teams." These themes help you see how established communication structures influence team dynamics in a virtual environment.

While you're working within an existing theoretical framework, this analysis provides valuable insights about how these principles play out in modern remote work settings – showing both what holds true and what might need updating for virtual contexts. Tools like Delve can help you systematically apply such frameworks and track where your data aligns or diverges from existing theories.

📌 Simplify Your Inductive and Deductive Coding

No matter which approach you take, tools like Delve help keep both coding approaches manageable:

Inductive Coding: Spotting new patterns in your data is exciting, but keeping track of them all can get overwhelming. Nesting codes helps you organize these discoveries into meaningful categories as your understanding grows.

Inductive Coding with Nesting

Deductive Coding: Working with predetermined codes is tricky, especially with big datasets. You can import existing codebooks and use filtering tools using logical operators "and," "or," and "not" to focus on co-occurrences or exclude irrelevant data.

Deductive Coding with Filtering

Through an Inductive Lens: Capturing Candid Codes

Without theoretical constraints, you'll look for patterns that naturally connect in your data based on everything you read in your data. The process starts with several deep readings of all your transcripts: 

1. Start with the Data: Start by immersing yourself in the interview transcripts without any preconceived theories. You are looking for patterns but not coding at this point. Writing memos helps track your thoughts and ideas without losing them.

2. Create Codes from Data: You identify patterns and initial codes from what you’ve read in the data. Your analysis here might include codes like team bonding on Zoom, loss of informal interactions, and digital communication barriers.

📄 Remote Work Study - Interview Excerpt with Inductive Codes

"The morning standup used to be this quick check-in1 where we'd grab coffee after2. Now it's this formal Zoom thing3 where everyone's watching their video square. James still tries to crack his terrible jokes, but it's not the same when staring at a screen4."

Codes:

  • 1 Informal touchpoints lost
  • 2 Lost transition spaces
  • 3 Formalization of casual meetings
  • 4 Digital barriers to connection

3. Develop Themes from Codes: Now, you group these codes into broader themes that reflect the underlying stories and experiences of your respondents. For example, combining these codes might lead to a theme like: "Transformation of Workplace Social Dynamics."

You've gone from a mess of raw data and discovered a story about lost informal moments and changed team dynamics, with digital barriers reshaping how people connect at work. Your themes build naturally from the patterns you see and read directly in your participants' own words. 

💡 Tracking Your Reflexivity

Remember, your own experience with remote work might influence how you interpret these comments. That's normal – just note it in your memos to maintain reflexivity! With Delve, you can add memos to specific excerpts and codes and track all your ideas in one web-based location. Learn more about memo-writing in our memo guide.

Making Memos Matter in Thematic Analysis

Your journey from raw data to meaningful themes isn't a straight line. As we’ve shown, it involves a process of discovery, reflection, and refinement. Analytical memos help you navigate this journey by capturing your evolving insights and analytical decisions. When you're deep in analysis, wondering how you got from certain codes to a particular theme, your memos map out your thinking.

Benefits of Analytical Memos:

  • Tracks Your Analytical Process: Memos provide a record of your thinking at different stages, which is invaluable for reflecting on your analysis.

  • Supports Reflexivity: Clearly documenting your thoughts helps you remain aware of how your perspectives influence the interpretation of data.

  • Facilitates Transparency: Detailed documentation makes your analytical process transparent to others, enhancing the credibility of your research.

For example, your memos in our remote work example might track how seemingly unrelated inductive codes about "home office setup" and "meeting fatigue" led you to deeper insights about work-life boundaries. These reflections become especially valuable when writing up your findings or explaining your analytical process to others.

👣 Two Paths to Memo in Thematic Analysis

▼ Deductive Memo: "Applied media richness theory to analyze virtual standup meetings. Noting how video calls reshape informal communication patterns in ways theory didn't anticipate—possible extension regarding digital ritual adaptation?"

▲ Inductive Memo: "Recurring pattern of 'lost informal moments' across interviews. Standups changing from social touchpoints to formal check-ins. This seems to affect team cohesion. Should explore further in subsequent interviews."

Framing the Broader Thematic Analysis Process

 

While there's no single "right way" to do thematic analysis, Braun and Clarke's six-step framework has become a trusted guide for many researchers. From your first read-through of the data to your final write-up, these steps provide helpful waypoints in your analytical journey and give a sense of structure to the process. You'll see how these steps naturally unfold in our examples of both approaches.

Braun & Clarke’s Six Steps to Thematic Analysis

Whether working with theoretical frameworks or building understanding directly from your data, these fundamental steps guide your analysis:

  1. Familiarizing yourself with the data

  2. Generating initial codes

  3. Searching for themes

  4. Reviewing themes

  5. Defining and naming themes

  6. Producing your report

The strength of this process is its adaptability. In the following sections, you'll see how these steps play out whether you're working with established theories or creating new understanding through careful analysis of your data.

 

How to Do Deductive Thematic Analysis

Here are a few more examples related to our remote work project from earlier. Remember, with deductive thematic analysis, existing theories shape how you identify and construct your themes. Theory is your foundation.

Deductive Thematic Analysis Example

Let’s say you’re using Media Richness Theory as the framework to code your transcripts. This theory proposes that different communication channels vary in their ability to convey complex information – some channels (like face-to-face) are "richer" than others (like email). Seeing overlap with remote work, you want to analyze how different communication channels work best for different types of messages using this theory as your filter.

When analyzing your data through this theoretical lens, you create codes that reflect the theory's core concepts:

  • "Changes in communication channels" (when participants say "this formal Zoom thing")

  • "Shifts in information sharing" (mentions of lost spontaneous exchanges)

  • "Alterations in social presence" (comments like "not the same when staring at a screen")

These theoretically-driven codes come together to form your final theme, "Digital Transformation of Workplace Communication." You're not creating this theme from the data. Instead, you're using the data to explore and extend media richness theory's ideas about how channel characteristics affect communication amidst the rise of remote work.

Theme: Digital Transformation of Workplace Communication

This theme explores how the characteristics of virtual communication channels impact workplace dynamics, extending the principles of media richness theory. The data highlights how reduced cues in virtual settings affect how teams interact and share information.

Code: Changes in Communication Channels

Definition: Captures mentions like "this formal Zoom thing," reflecting how reduced nonverbal cues in virtual channels limit communication richness.

Code: Shifts in Information Sharing

Definition: Captures mentions of "lost spontaneous exchanges," showing how virtual environments reduce informal, rich information sharing.

Code: Alterations in Social Presence

Definition: Captures comments like "not the same when staring at a screen," reflecting how virtual communication diminishes the personal and emotional richness of interactions.

Reference: Delve Qualitative Data Analysis Software

Watch for places where your data challenges or extends your theoretical framework – these can reveal important nuances in the theory you wrap into your write-up. Delve includes a filtering system that helps you organize codes by theoretical constructs and track insights through memos, making it easier to call up instances where your data supports and challenges existing theory.

💡 Best Practices: Deductive Thematic Analysis

  • Create theory-based codes: Develop codes that directly reflect key concepts from your theoretical framework. This keeps your analysis focused and aligned with your research questions.
  • Stay open to new insights: While guided by theory, remain attentive to data that doesn’t fit neatly within existing concepts. These may indicate areas where the theory can be expanded.
  • Use CAQDAS tools: Tools like Delve help you organize theory-driven codes and memos effectively, manage complex analyses, and maintain a clear connection between your data and theoretical constructs.

How to Do Inductive Thematic Analysis

Now, you’re letting data lead the way. By immersing yourself in the transcripts and what respondents are saying, you might notice how different codes cluster together into meaningful themes. This happens through careful and repetitive reading of your interviews and paying attention to what your participants keep coming back to without any pre-determined ideas or assumptions. Here's how this might look:

Inductive Thematic Analysis Example

Returning to our remote work example, you might notice a lot of comments about virtual meetings as you read (and re-read) your transcripts. Often, they connect to deeper issues about workplace relationships and team dynamics. As you analyze more interviews, these connections become clearer and point to larger patterns at play. 

You build towards your themes by connecting these patterns (individual codes) in your data. Here are what the codes might look like:

  • “Lost Informal Moments”: The participant mentions, "we'd grab coffee after," highlighting the absence of casual interactions in the virtual environment.

  • “Changed Social Dynamics”: The observation "it's not the same when you're staring at a screen" points to a shift in how team members relate to one another.

  • “Digital Environment Impacts”: References to "this formal Zoom thing" and "everyone's watching their video square" suggest the formalization and perhaps depersonalization of meetings.

Why You Might Notice These Patterns:

  • Participant Emphasis: The participant emphasizes certain aspects of their experience, indicating their significance. Phrases like "it's not the same" signal a meaningful change worth exploring.

  • Repetition Across Data: If multiple participants mention similar experiences, it suggests a common theme affecting many individuals.

  • Emotional Indicators: Words like "still tries to crack his terrible jokes" convey nostalgia or a longing for past dynamics, which can be important in understanding the impact of remote work.

These patterns come together to tell a story about how virtual work reshapes workplace relationships, all drawn directly from your participants' experiences and words. Your theme: "The Erosion of Informal Workplace Bonds in Virtual Environments." 

Theme: The Erosion of Informal Workplace Bonds in Virtual Environments

This theme captures how virtual work reshapes workplace relationships, highlighting shifts in social interactions and communication patterns based on participants' experiences and words.

Code: Lost Informal Moments

Definition: The participant mentions, "we'd grab coffee after," highlighting the absence of casual interactions in the virtual environment.

Code: Changed Social Dynamics

Definition: The observation, "it's not the same when you're staring at a screen," points to a shift in how team members relate to one another.

Code: Digital Environment Impacts

Definition: References to "this formal Zoom thing" and "everyone's watching their video square" suggest the formalization and depersonalization of meetings.

Reference: Delve Qualitative Data Analysis Software

This new theme doesn’t come from theory but from carefully reading and analyzing what your participants tell you about their changing workplace connections. Inductive thematic analysis's flexibility allows you to honor the participants' voices and unique perspectives. Taking time with each step opens doors to unexpected discoveries!

💡 Best Practices: Inductive Thematic Analysis

  • Iterative Coding: Continually refine your codes as you analyze more data. This iterative process allows you to capture unforeseen nuances and ensures that your coding remains responsive to the data. Delve is built for easy adjustments, enabling you to track changes and refine codes throughout the analysis.
  • Memo Writing: Record your thoughts and insights throughout the coding process. Delve’s memo-writing feature lets you link memos directly to specific codes or themes, helping you track how your ideas about the data develop over time.
  • Theme Development: Group related codes into broader themes that tell a cohesive story. This involves analyzing how different codes interact and what they collectively reveal about your research question. Data visualization tools, like the ones Delve offers, help you easily reorganize and uncover these connections to develop your themes.

What’s the challenge with both of these approaches? Staying organized when working with hundreds of codes and an overwhelming amount of documents. Coding tools like Delve make it easy to create, adjust, and categorize codes and manage this data bottleneck as your project develops.

Common Challenges with Inductive Thematic Analysis vs. Deductive Thematic Analysis (and Practical Solutions)

While inductive and deductive thematic analysis are powerful ways to make sense of overwhelming amounts of data, you'll likely encounter some challenges along the way. Using the wrong coding tools only compounds these issues. Here's what to look out for and how modern CAQDAS (coding software) makes it a lot easier to manage:

Challenges with Deductive Thematic Analysis

1. Theory Tunnel Vision: When working with theory, you might find yourself squeezing data into categories even when it's not quite right. For example, you might label all mentions of "email communication" under "formal channels" just because your theory suggests it, missing how teams actually use email for informal connection.

Solution: Create specific codes for data that challenge or extend your theory. Delve's filtering system lets you easily track and review these instances when refining your analysis.

2. Overlooking Context: Theoretical frameworks often focus on specific elements while ignoring situational factors that might be crucial. In remote work research, you might focus so much on communication patterns that you miss how different time zones or home situations fundamentally change how these patterns play out.

Solution: Use memos to document surprising findings or patterns outside your framework. Delve lets you attach these memos directly to relevant excerpts, making it easy to revisit these insights during analysis.

 
 

3. Missing Nuances: In deductive thematic analysis, applying a pre-defined set of codes to your data can sometimes feel rigid and hyper-focused, potentially missing nuanced insights or emergent sub-themes.

Solution: AI can be a powerful tool for analyzing data, but it cannot construct meaning the way you (a human researcher) can. Delve’s AI tools offer a variety of AI features that can act as your assistant. You can use the “Apply Codes with AI” feature if you're coding deductively. And when you’re doing further rounds of coding, you can use “AI Chat” to help explore your data and suggest new subcodes..

 
 

Challenges with Inductive Analysis

1. Code Proliferation: Without theoretical constraints, you might end up with hundreds of codes, making it impossible to see larger patterns. This often happens when coding gets too granular or when similar ideas are coded differently across interviews. When your code list grows too large, it becomes harder to maintain consistency and spot meaningful connections across your data.

Solution: Regularly review and consolidate your codes. Delve's organization features include the ability to nest codes, making it easier to spot redundancies and combine related concepts without setting anything in stone.

2. Theme Development Paralysis: Moving from individual codes to meaningful themes can feel overwhelming when you have lots of data. How do you step back and figure out how they fit into a meaningful narrative based purely on your data? It's easy to get stuck seeing only disconnected patterns rather than cohesive themes.

Solution: Start grouping related codes early in your analysis. Delve visualization tools help you map relationships between codes and experiment with different theme structures without losing your original organization.

3. Navigating a Sea of Data: When you're knee-deep in inductive thematic analysis, finding the exact piece of data, source, or participant you need can feel like searching for a beacon in the fog. You know it's there, but how do you pinpoint it without getting lost and bogged down by the search?

Solution: Delve's project-wide search function is your lighthouse. With just a few keywords, you can instantly locate specific codes or themes, keeping your analysis process smooth and focused. This tool ensures that no insight is ever truly out of reach as you listen to your data, helping you navigate its complexities with confidence.

 
 

Your Options: The Best Tool for Thematic Analysis

Your choice between deductive and inductive analysis isn't just about where you start – it's about how you engage with your data throughout your research journey. Delve is a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) that optimizes how you approach thematic analysis from start to finish. All in one web-based location.

Manual vs. Modern Thematic Analysis Tools

 
 

The goal of any tool is to make work easier, not create new problems to solve.

  • Traditional methods like pen and paper, spreadsheets, or word processors can slow your thematic analysis to a crawl. Most researchers don’t have time to wade through hundreds of paper snippets or scroll endlessly through spreadsheet cells to find related codes.

  • Though sticky notes and highlighters can be helpful for organizing early code, they become more impractical once the analysis expands beyond a certain point.

  • Some CAQDAS platforms solve these problems but introduce new ones. Steep learning curves or price points that strain research budgets are not student-friendly. Here’s how a few of these options compare to Delve.

Tools to Help, Not Hinder Your Analysis | Meet Delve

Delve is a top-rated coding software that lets you focus on what matters: understanding your data, staying reflexive, and developing meaningful insights. Try Delve free for 14 days to see how you keep research questions at the forefront of your study, stay organized, and embrace the iterative nature of qualitative analysis!

 
 

See Why Researchers Choose Delve

Join thousands of researchers who've chosen Delve for its intuitive interface and powerful features. Whether you're working solo or collaborating with a team, Delve's modern approach to qualitative analysis helps you stay focused on what matters most - understanding your data.

Try Delve Free for 14 Days

No commitment. Cancel anytime.

Other Ways to Analyze Code Qualitative Data

Looking to learn about other qualitative methods? Deductive and inductive thematic analysis are just two approaches among many. Read our Essential Guide to Coding Qualitative Data to explore other qualitative approaches.

Methodology Articles

References

Cite this blog post

Thematic AnalysisDaniel Politz