Awareness, access, and communication: provider perspectives on early intervention services for children with sickle cell disease
Department of Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
How they used Delve
Researchers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and Washington University in St. Louis used Delve to code 20 semi-structured provider interviews about early intervention for children with sickle cell disease, with two team members building and reconciling separate codebooks for medical and early intervention providers using inductive thematic analysis.
“Two research team members used an iterative process to review all qualitative transcripts using DelveTool Software (26). Coders used an inductive thematic analysis approach to generate themes for a preliminary codebook (27).”
- Field
- Pediatric hematology / early intervention and developmental services
- Data
- 20 semi-structured phone interviews — 10 medical providers (primary care physicians, hematologists, nurse practitioners, a social worker) and 10 early intervention providers (mostly occupational therapists) — recruited by snowball sampling across two sites
- Approach
- Inductive thematic analysis of RE-AIM-framed semi-structured interviews; two coders built separate preliminary codebooks for each provider group from four interviews, reconciled deviations, then applied the final codebooks to all transcripts
- Data types
- Interviews
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify determinants influencing the utilization of early intervention services among young children with sickle cell disease (SCD) based on perspectives from medical and early intervention providers. Design and methods: Early intervention and medical providers from the catchment area surrounding St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and Washington University were recruited (20 total providers). Interviews were completed over the phone and audio recorded. All interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Three overarching themes were identified from both groups: Awareness (e.g., lack of awareness about the EI system and SCD), Access (e.g., difficulties accessing services), and Communication (e.g., limited communication between medical and early intervention providers, and between providers and families). Although these three themes were shared by medical and early intervention providers, the differing perspectives of each produced subthemes unique to the two professional fields. Conclusions: Early intervention services can limit the neurodevelopmental deficits experienced by young children with SCD; however, most children with SCD do not receive these services. The perspectives of early intervention and medical providers highlight several potential solutions to increase early intervention utilization among young children with SCD.
Citation
Andrew M. Heitzer, Erin MacArthur, Mollie Tamboli, Ashley Wilson, Jane S. Hankins, Catherine R. Hoyt (2024). Awareness, access, and communication: provider perspectives on early intervention services for children with sickle cell disease. Frontiers in Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1366522