Generative AI in Higher Education Constituent Relationship Management (CRM): Opportunities, Challenges, and Implementation Strategies
Pennsylvania State University
How they used Delve
Researchers at Pennsylvania State University used Delve to code 20 semi-structured interviews with higher education CRM practitioners about generative AI, developing a grounded-theory codebook to saturation and then using Delve's AI code assistant to recommend how codes applied to a subset of the data, which the researchers reviewed before making final coding decisions.
“As an innovative approach to enhance trustworthiness, we utilized the GenAI code assistant GPT feature known as the Delve qualitative analysis tool (https://app.delvetool.com). Once the code book was developed to the point of saturation by the researchers, the tool was used to recommend the coding application of a subset of data, followed by researcher review. The researchers retained final coding decisions to ensure methodological dependability and confirmability.”
- Field
- Higher education administration / CRM and generative AI
- Data
- Semi-structured interviews with 20 participants involved in higher education CRM and generative AI implementation
- Approach
- Grounded theory: open-ended coding of semi-structured interviews followed by thematic analysis; a co-researcher validated coding and themes, and Delve's AI code assistant recommended coding for a subset of data once the codebook reached saturation, with researchers keeping final decisions
- Data types
- Interviews
Abstract
This research explores opportunities for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education constituent (customer) relationship management (CRM) to address the industry’s need for digital transformation driven by demographic shifts, economic challenges, and technological advancements. Using a qualitative research approach grounded in the principles of grounded theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews and an open-ended qualitative data collection instrument with technology vendors, implementation consultants, and HEI professionals that are actively exploring GenAI applications. Our findings highlight six primary types of GenAI—textual analysis and synthesis, data summarization, next-best action recommendations, speech synthesis and translation, code development, and image and video creation—each with applications across student recruitment, advising, alumni engagement, and administrative processes. We propose an evaluative framework with eight readiness criteria to assess institutional preparedness for GenAI adoption. While GenAI offers potential benefits, such as increased efficiency, reduced costs, and improved student engagement, its success depends on data readiness, ethical safeguards, and institutional leadership. By integrating GenAI as a co-intelligence alongside human expertise, HEIs can enhance CRM ecosystems and better support their constituents.
Citation
Carrie H. Marcinkevage, Akhil Kumar (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education Constituent Relationship Management (CRM): Opportunities, Challenges, and Implementation Strategies. Computers. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14030101