A process evaluation of the development and early implementation of a complex strategy to reduce serious youth violence in Lambeth
London South Bank University (PHIRST)
How they used Delve
Public-health researchers at London South Bank University used Delve across the strands of a process evaluation of Lambeth Made Safer, coding 29 policy documents, focus groups with 11 participants, and interviews with two to four researchers per strand and organising themes collaboratively, including with peer researchers.
“A coding framework was developed inductively by four researchers and the peer researchers: both peer researchers conducted broad coding on one transcript which supported the development of the coding framework. Data were coded on Delve software by four researchers and were organised into themes collaboratively by the team”
- Field
- violence prevention; public-health approach; process evaluation
- Data
- 29 strategy documents, focus groups with 11 participants, and stakeholder interviews on the development and early implementation of the Lambeth Made Safer strategy (2020 to 2030)
- Approach
- Multi-strand process evaluation: documentary content analysis, thematic analysis of focus groups and interviews with inductively built coding frameworks applied in Delve by teams of researchers
- Data types
- Documents, Focus groups, Interviews
Citation
Susie Sykes, Jessica T. Oha, Thomas Mills, Felicity Morrow, Richard Ashiagbor, Catherine Jenkins, Temitope Onasanya, Jane Wills (2025). A process evaluation of the development and early implementation of a complex strategy to reduce serious youth violence in Lambeth. London South Bank University Research Open (PHIRST full report). https://doi.org/10.18744/eaedea38-3b8b-43a1-ba64-f34cdf9db9ee