Real‐world use of lecanemab: patient pathway findings from a US multicenter study
LEADER study group (12 US sites), sponsored by Eisai Inc.
How they used Delve
The LEADER study group, an Eisai-sponsored multicenter study of real-world lecanemab use, used Delve to code interviews with 12 neurologists at 12 US sites about referral and diagnostic pathways; two analysts coded independently in Delve with a deductive codebook derived from the survey results plus inductive codes for new concepts.
“De‐identified interview transcripts were coded using deductive content analysis, with predetermined codes derived from survey results, and inductive content analysis, whereby new codes were generated upon reviewing interview themes/concepts. Coding was conducted independently by two analysts using Delve qualitative data analysis software.”
- Field
- Neurology / Alzheimer's disease treatment pathways
- Data
- Surveys and interview transcripts from 12 health-care providers (neurologists) at 12 diverse US sites, collected April to November 2025
- Approach
- Interim sub-analysis of the multicenter LEADER study: cross-sectional health-care provider surveys summarised descriptively, and interviews coded with deductive content analysis (codes derived from survey results) plus inductive content analysis for new codes
- Data types
- Interviews, Open-ended survey responses
Abstract
Abstract Introduction To ensure Alzheimer’s disease‐modifying treatments can be initiated in diverse populations, efficient pathways to obtain timely diagnoses are required. Methods This interim sub‐analysis of a multicenter US study included cross‐sectional surveys and interviews with neurologists at 12 diverse sites to assess real‐world lecanemab use. Results At survey completion, ∼1342 patients had received lecanemab. Most referrals originated from primary care. Amyloid pathology was confirmed primarily by positron emission tomography (58%) or cerebrospinal fluid (35%), with blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) increasingly used to reduce diagnostic delays. All sites performed apolipoprotein E4 (APOE ε4) testing to inform risk/benefit decisions. Infusions usually started within 6 months of diagnosis. Delayed/incomplete referrals were identified as the most significant barrier in the current patient pathway. Discussion These findings demonstrate the feasibility of lecanemab integration in diverse clinical settings and highlight the importance of primary care physician engagement, optimization of referral pathways, and expanding BBM use in improving timely diagnosis, equitable access, and early treatment initiation.
Citation
Michael Rosenbloom, Courtney Adams, Brooke Allen, Brent Berry, Christian Camargo, Gregory Cooper, Samuel Giles, Cara Leahy, Marwan Sabbagh, Martin Sadowski, Curtis Schreiber, P Schulz, José Soria, David Weisman, Feride Frech, Daryl Jones (2026). Real‐world use of lecanemab: patient pathway findings from a US multicenter study. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70376