Caregiver and provider perspectives on developmental services for children with sickle cell disease: a mixed methods analysis
Department of Psychology and Biobehavioral Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
How they used Delve
Pediatric psychology researchers at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital used Delve to code interviews with 15 caregivers and 15 providers about developmental services for young children with sickle cell disease. Two coders coded each transcript independently in Delve with a priori and inductive codes, met to resolve discrepancies, and reorganised the agreed codes into a categorization matrix.
“After the data were transcribed and assessed for quality, each transcript was coded by two independent coders (MT and EM) using Delve Tool software (34). [...] The two coders met during and after their independent coding processes to discuss their findings and resolve coding discrepancies.”
- Field
- Pediatric neuropsychology / sickle cell disease
- Data
- Semi-structured interviews with 15 providers and 15 caregivers of children aged 4 to 6 with sickle cell disease, transcribed verbatim by a third-party service
- Approach
- Mixed methods; interviews coded deductively with a priori codes and inductively for recurring topics by two independent coders who met to resolve discrepancies, then organised in a categorization matrix (Elo and Kyngäs)
- Data types
- Interviews, Open-ended survey responses
Abstract
Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenic blood disorder characterized by neurodevelopmental delays. Most children with SCD do not receive developmental services due in part to disparities in care access. To inform the design of a developmental intervention for children with SCD, we evaluated factors that influence access to developmental services. Methods: = 15) of children aged 4-6 years with SCD at a single center and the surrounding area. Caregivers completed questionnaires about their child’s background/medical history, caregiver depression (PROMIS SF v1.0-8a), and caregiver knowledge of early development (Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory). A convergent design was used to integrate the qualitative and quantitative data. Results: We identified three themes as factors that influence caregivers’ access to developmental services: quality of medical and educational experiences, caregiver knowledge and beliefs about SCD and development, and caregiver preferences for developmental services. Most caregivers denied barriers to obtaining developmental services for their child, whereas providers acknowledged numerous barriers for families. Caregivers and providers shared that a positive caregiver-provider relationship facilitates access. Caregivers reported that there was limited attention to SCD within the hospital system and broader society. Caregivers displayed limited knowledge of early development, and providers identified these knowledge gaps as a barrier to utilizing developmental services. Caregivers expressed a strong interest in SCD education and community building. Conclusions: Our mixed method analysis identified barriers and facilitators to developmental services for children with SCD.
Citation
Mollie Tamboli, Erin MacArthur, Natalie Collins, Eun Young Kang, M. Fernandez, Jerlym S. Porter, Heather M. Conklin, Allison A. King, Jane S. Hankins, Andrew M. Heitzer (2025). Caregiver and provider perspectives on developmental services for children with sickle cell disease: a mixed methods analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1530457